View {title}

Periodic review and revision process

Auditing Platform

Periodic review and revision process Quality Management and Leadership Responsibilities

Why is the definition of the life cycle of QMS documents needed

  • Establish clear procedures for document creation, approval, review, and archiving.
  • Ensure document integrity, reliability, and compliance throughout their lifecycle.
  • Facilitate standardized document management processes within the CTU.
  • Align periodic review cycle with industry/ GCP best practices, typically within at least a 3-year timeframe.

Audit observations: What was missing?

Periodic review cycle for documents was too long (5 years) and not aligned with GCP best practices.

Recommendations:

  • Amend SOP to reflect a periodic review cycle of at least every 3 years. 
  • Implement standardised procedures for document management, including document identification and approval.
  • Implement also standardised procedures that define the
    • editing rights for document revision.
    • training period for the revised document to ensure proper understanding of the changes.
    • appropriate individuals are informed about the new document version and receive the necessary training.

Download

You can download this article as a PDF.